Metro Nashville Public Schools Establish the Accelerating Scholars Program

Similar to students in many U.S. school districts, Metro Nashville Public Schools (MNPS) students experienced unfinished learning as a result of the pandemic. This was particularly prominent in elementary school reading and middle school math, where the pandemic worsened existing inequities. Enter the Accelerating Scholars Program.

In its first year, this targeted, intensive tutoring program served more than 4,000 students. MNPS originally had an ambitious goal of serving 7,000 students, but district leaders scaled back in the first year to maintain quality. Students in the Accelerating Scholars Program receive tutoring three times per week for at least 30 minutes at a time, always with the same tutor, and with no more than three students. All of the tutors, whether full-time educators or volunteers, are trained in tutoring best practices. Curriculum is on grade level, not remedial, because district leaders believe that this is essential to accelerating learning.

To ensure that the Accelerating Scholars Program is effective and prioritizes students most impacted by the pandemic, the district created an equity matrix using academic data. Nashville prioritized schools and students based on academic need (e.g., students who scored below the 60th percentile on Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) assessment) and readiness to host tutoring based on a school’s infrastructure. The program collects weekly survey data from tutors and students, social emotional learning data, and MAP data to measure success.

This practice was featured by The Education Trust in Promising Practices: A School District Guide to Advocating for Equity in American Rescue Plan Spending. 

Lessons Learned:

1. Quality should be prioritized over quantity.

While more students could have received SOME tutoring, research shows that growth happens when students receive GREAT tutoring, which is why MNPS kept their tutor to student ratio low, even though that meant fewer students received services in the first year of the program.

2. Stakeholder engagement is crucial to a program’s success.

Tutoring takes time and investment from all involved. Families, community organizations, and school leaders have to work collaboratively to achieve potential academic gains.

3. Targeted intensive tutoring can be fiscally feasible and is worth the effort.

Generating curriculum and finding enough staff to operate a large-scale tutoring program takes a lot of time and energy. It may seem like outsourcing to vendors is a good option when time and resources are limited. MNPS realized, however, that vendors would cost almost six times as much to run their tutoring program and that the district would lose the flexibility to tailor curriculum to their district and students. Though it took much more effort upfront, the tutoring program can now be sustained for only about $450 per student per semester, which is cost effective.

About the Author

Chad Aldeman is a nationally recognized expert on education policy, including school finance; teacher preparation, evaluation, and compensation; and state standards, assessment, and accountability. Keep up with Chad on the EduProgess: Unpacked blog.

Stay Up to Date on Recovery News!

Enter your name and email address here to receive periodic updates on EduProgress and K-12 recovery news.

Sign Up for Updates